ffffound and attribution

Comments

On a traditional blog, you could help matters a little by at least leaving a comment on the first one, pointing to the original. But of course that would trigger ffffound's terror of text..
Another example, with a slightly different problem: a while ago I posted this from BLDGBLOG, deliberately using the smaller photo so as to leave in context. All of a sudden, the larger version, which doesn't really have any clues as to its source, is becoming popular.

I suppose asking sites to wrap images in pages such that they're clickable is somewhat unfair, but it is a problem (and I've sinned too; the versions of the graphics on this Ace Jet 170 post about the Practical Idealists book were too small to post to ffffound unless I used the popups, which lose the attribution).
True, but I doubt many people do that either.
[this is good]
Ffffound might be an involuntary tool for teaching designers to frame images for the web more effectively.

It's exposed problems most for images served from blogger.com - the big version that you want on Ffffound generally has an alphanumeric URL with no connection to the originating site, so a lot of associations are lost.
The loss of (if I may be psuedish) you might call "referential integrity" on images from Blogger got noted by Monoscope, in a post that was referred to in the Alexander Bohm post I mentioned in passing. I noted that Flickr does provide (by accident and/or history) a fairly easy way of getting a photo from its ID, but you're right that Blogger doesn't.

That's partly a technical, not a design, difference, though, to do with the architecture of picture servers, although you're right that good design can mitigate against it. Lightbox JavaScript seems to be a good fix.
Seems to me there's probably a technical solution to the social problem.

At least with bare images, the ffffound bookmarklet could use document.referrer instead of location.href when it posts the image.

Sadly http://ffffound.com/bookmarklet.js is implemented as an anonymous object with a fresh token each time, so there's no way I know of for us to do this ourselves. (If they'd namespaced it we could rewrite it).

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

About Me

Paul Mison
United Kingdom
del.icio.us:
blech
Dopplr:
blech
FFFFOUND!:
blech
Flickr:
blech
Last.fm:
blech
Twitter:
blech
Upcoming:
blech

Neighborhood

Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.

Archives

  • Powered by Vox